Sunday, June 16, 2019

PSY-499 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

PSY-499 - Essay ExamplePougnet, et al, (2011) there is significant difference in the cognitive command and complaisant wellbeing of the chelaren who have a longer and close attachment with the masculine parentIn the development of a tike from infancy, the immediate environment plays a vital role in defining the cognitive development of the nestling. This explains the varied behavior of children in various interactive societal environments. In respect of the cardinal social input of the male parent to the childs future behavior, children from parents who are incarcerated tend to differ marginally from the ones with their male parents around their daily life (Dick, 2011). Both the mother and the father have an influence in shaping the psychological development and maturity of the children. Finley & Schwartz,(2007) from their analytical experiments using Statistical tests of significance indicates that the mother plays primary role as far as the infants perception of the world is concerned. However as the child grows, the male parent to a fault contribute immensely in his/her fundamental interaction with the new world and absorption of various concepts in life. Various scholars have explored the social inadequacies that are likely to erupt in the life of the child in the absence of the male parent. Some of the cases that may lead to this absence are also highlighted with more focus on male incarceration (Menning & Stewart, 2008). The effect of male parents absence is two sided in the social life of the child since there is a certain perception such children will develop about the absent fathers and this gradually alters the cognitive and moral interaction of the child in the society.The childs language skills cannot be learnt from watching infant directed DVDs or any audio-visual program from the media and it is this point where physical interaction of the male parent through playing with the child come in handy .Coakley,(2013) asserts that children are not able to relate visual objects with real

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.